Key Takeaways
- Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) give real-time glucose readings every 1-5 minutes, helping users see exactly how food, exercise, and sleep affect their blood sugar patterns.
- A meta-analysis in Diabetes Care found that CGM use was associated with an average HbA1c reduction of 0.5%.[1]
- Smartphone apps, smart scales, wearable fitness trackers, and telemedicine platforms now form an interconnected system for blood sugar tracking and wellness support.
- AI-powered food logging and personalized glucose predictions are emerging tools that may improve dietary decision-making for people interested in blood sugar wellness.
The way people track and understand their blood sugar has changed more in the past decade than in the previous fifty years. Devices that once required a trip to the lab now sit on your arm or in your pocket. Apps that once only counted calories can now photograph your meal and estimate its likely glucose impact.
For people interested in blood sugar wellness, these tools aren't about replacing medical care. They're about gaining a clearer picture of how your body responds to daily choices. According to a 2017 meta-analysis in Diabetes Care, the use of continuous glucose monitoring was linked to an average HbA1c improvement of 0.5%, a clinically meaningful change.[1] And that's just one category of technology in a rapidly growing field.
This guide walks through the major categories of blood sugar technology available today, from glucose monitors to AI food trackers. We'll cover what each tool does, who it's best suited for, and what the research says about its effectiveness. No medical claims here, just a practical look at the tools that help people understand their glucose patterns better.
What Are Continuous Glucose Monitors and Why Do They Matter?
Continuous glucose monitors have become the most talked-about tool in blood sugar technology. The global CGM market reached an estimated $8.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at over 9% annually through 2030, according to market analyses reported in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.[2] That growth reflects both expanding medical use and rising interest from health-conscious consumers.
How CGMs work
A CGM consists of a small sensor, usually about the size of a coin, that's inserted just beneath the skin on the upper arm or abdomen. The sensor measures glucose levels in the interstitial fluid (the fluid between cells) every 1 to 5 minutes. It transmits that data wirelessly to a smartphone app or a dedicated reader device.
Unlike a traditional finger-prick glucose meter, which gives you a single snapshot, a CGM shows a continuous line of data. You can see trends, patterns, and the real-time effect of everything from a bowl of oatmeal to a 20-minute walk. That level of detail is what makes CGMs so valuable for understanding individual glucose responses.
Major CGM systems available today
- FreeStyle Libre 3 (Abbott): A 14-day sensor about the size of two stacked coins. Now available over the counter in the US without a prescription. Readings are sent to a smartphone app every minute. It's one of the most affordable CGM options
- Dexcom G7: A 10-day sensor with a warm-up time of about 30 minutes. Known for its accuracy and integration with insulin pumps. Requires a prescription in most countries. The companion app provides real-time alerts for high and low readings
- Dexcom Stelo: Designed specifically for people with type 2 diabetes or those who don't use insulin. Available over the counter. Uses the same sensor technology as the G7 in a simplified app experience
- Eversense E3 (Senseonics): An implantable sensor that lasts up to 6 months. Inserted by a healthcare provider under the skin of the upper arm. Best suited for people who want to avoid frequent sensor changes
A key study published in The Lancet (the IMPACT trial) found that CGM use in people with type 1 diabetes reduced time spent in hypoglycemia by 38% without increasing HbA1c.[3] For people with type 2 diabetes, a separate randomized trial showed that CGM use over 8 months led to significant improvements in time-in-range compared to traditional finger-stick monitoring.[4]
If you're considering a CGM but aren't sure it's worth the investment, many companies offer 14-day trial periods. Even a single two-week trial can reveal how your body responds to specific foods, exercise, and sleep patterns. The data from those two weeks often changes how people eat for years afterward.
Are Traditional Blood Glucose Meters Still Useful?
Traditional finger-prick glucose meters remain the most widely used blood sugar monitoring tool worldwide. The WHO estimates that over 460 million people globally live with diabetes, and the vast majority rely on standard meters rather than CGMs.[5] These devices are still accurate, affordable, and practical for many people.
How modern meters have improved
Today's glucose meters are smaller, faster, and more accurate than their predecessors. Many require only a tiny blood sample (0.3-0.6 microliters), provide results in under 5 seconds, and connect to smartphone apps via Bluetooth. Some models store up to 1,000 readings with time stamps. This connectivity means your glucose data can be shared with healthcare providers or integrated into broader health-tracking platforms.
When a meter makes more sense than a CGM
- Budget constraints: A good glucose meter costs $15-40, with test strips at $0.20-0.80 each. CGMs run $75-350 per month depending on the system and insurance coverage
- Occasional monitoring: If you only need to check fasting glucose or post-meal levels a few times per week, a meter provides the information you need without the ongoing cost of a CGM
- Confirmation testing: Even CGM users sometimes use a finger-prick meter to confirm readings during rapid glucose changes, since interstitial glucose can lag behind blood glucose by 5-15 minutes
A study in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (even without CGM) was associated with a modest but statistically significant improvement in HbA1c of 0.3% in people with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.[6] The key word is "structured," meaning testing at specific times and using the data to inform decisions, not just testing randomly.
Which Smartphone Apps Help with Blood Sugar Tracking?
Health apps have grown into a major category, with the digital health market projected to exceed $500 billion by 2027, according to estimates published in npj Digital Medicine.[7] For blood sugar tracking specifically, apps range from simple logging tools to sophisticated platforms that combine glucose data, food intake, activity, and sleep into a single dashboard.
Glucose logging apps
- MySugr: One of the most popular diabetes management apps. Allows manual glucose entry, carbohydrate tracking, medication logging, and photo-based meal records. Syncs with several glucose meters and the FreeStyle Libre system
- Glucose Buddy: A straightforward logging app with food, medication, and glucose tracking. Generates reports that can be shared with healthcare providers
- Sugarmate: Designed primarily for CGM users, it pulls data from Dexcom and LibreLink to display glucose readings on your Apple Watch, provide smart alerts, and generate daily summaries
Food and nutrition tracking apps
- Cronometer: One of the most accurate food tracking apps, with a curated database that includes micronutrient data. Useful for understanding how specific meals affect glucose when used alongside a meter or CGM
- MyFitnessPal: The largest food database of any tracking app. Good for quick carbohydrate counting, though less precise for micronutrients than Cronometer
- Yazio: Combines food logging with fasting timers and recipe suggestions. The carbohydrate tracking features are helpful for people monitoring their intake
Research published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research found that people who used mobile health apps for blood sugar management showed a 0.48% greater reduction in HbA1c compared to control groups not using apps.[8] The improvement was most pronounced when apps included feedback mechanisms and educational content, not just passive data logging.
The best app is the one you'll actually use consistently. A simple app that you log meals in every day provides more value than a complex app you abandon after a week. Start with basic glucose and food logging. Add features only when the basic habit is solid.
How Do Wearable Fitness Trackers Support Blood Sugar Wellness?
Fitness trackers and smartwatches don't measure blood sugar directly (as of 2026), but they track variables that meaningfully affect glucose levels. A 2016 study in Diabetes Care found that each additional 2,000 steps per day was associated with a 6% lower risk of cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance.[9] Wearables make it easy to track and increase daily movement.
What wearables track that matters for blood sugar
- Step count and daily movement: Physical activity improves insulin sensitivity. Even light walking after meals can reduce post-meal glucose by 22% (Buffey et al., Sports Medicine, 2022).[10] Wearables gamify this with daily goals and reminders to move
- Heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV): HRV is a marker of autonomic nervous system function. Lower HRV has been associated with insulin resistance in research published in Diabetes Care.[11] Tracking HRV trends can indicate stress levels that may affect glucose
- Sleep duration and quality: Poor sleep is strongly linked to impaired glucose metabolism. A meta-analysis in Sleep Medicine Reviews found that both short sleep (under 6 hours) and poor sleep quality were associated with higher HbA1c levels.[12] Wearables that track sleep stages can help identify patterns worth addressing
- Stress indicators: Some devices use skin conductance or HRV-based algorithms to estimate stress levels. Chronic stress elevates cortisol, which in turn raises blood sugar. Seeing stress data alongside glucose data can reveal connections you might otherwise miss
Popular wearable options for blood sugar wellness
The Apple Watch, Fitbit (now Google), Garmin, and Oura Ring are the most commonly used wearables among people tracking health metrics. The Apple Watch and Fitbit offer the broadest app ecosystems, including integration with CGM apps like Sugarmate and Dexcom. Garmin devices tend to offer better battery life and detailed fitness metrics. The Oura Ring focuses on sleep and recovery data in a minimal form factor.
What's most interesting is the combination: wearing a CGM alongside a fitness tracker creates a remarkably detailed picture of how your body responds to daily life. You can correlate a poor night's sleep with higher fasting glucose the next morning, or see how a 15-minute walk after lunch flattens your glucose curve.
Can Smart Scales Help with Blood Sugar Management?
Body weight and composition are closely linked to insulin sensitivity. Research published in Diabetes Care showed that a 5-7% reduction in body weight was associated with a 58% reduced risk of progressing from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes in the landmark Diabetes Prevention Program study.[13] Smart scales make tracking weight and body composition easier and more informative.
What modern smart scales measure
Beyond simple weight, smart scales from brands like Withings, Eufy, and Renpho use bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to estimate body fat percentage, muscle mass, visceral fat, and water weight. While BIA isn't as accurate as DEXA scanning, it's consistent enough to track trends over time. And trends matter more than single readings for people focused on long-term blood sugar wellness.
Most smart scales sync with health apps via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, automatically logging each weigh-in. This removes the friction of manual tracking. When connected to a broader health system (glucose data, food log, step count), weight trends become one more data point in understanding your metabolic health.
Why visceral fat tracking matters
Visceral fat, the fat stored around internal organs, is more strongly associated with insulin resistance than subcutaneous fat. A study in Obesity Reviews found that visceral adiposity was an independent predictor of type 2 diabetes risk, even after adjusting for BMI.[14] Smart scales that estimate visceral fat can provide an additional signal beyond the number on the scale.
How Is Telemedicine Changing Blood Sugar Care?
Telemedicine expanded dramatically after 2020 and has become a standard part of blood sugar care. A systematic review in Diabetes Care found that telemedicine interventions for diabetes reduced HbA1c by an average of 0.57% compared to usual care.[15] That's comparable to the effect of some oral medications.
What telemedicine offers for blood sugar wellness
- More frequent check-ins: Virtual appointments are shorter and easier to schedule than in-person visits. This means healthcare providers can review glucose data more often and make smaller, more timely adjustments
- Remote data review: CGM data, glucose meter logs, and app-generated reports can be shared with providers before or during a virtual visit. The provider sees your actual data rather than relying on your memory of what happened since the last appointment
- Access in underserved areas: People in rural or underserved communities who may live hours from a specialist can now access endocrinologists and diabetes educators virtually. The ADA has endorsed telemedicine as a way to improve access to care.[16]
- Coaching and education: Several platforms now pair glucose monitoring with virtual health coaching. A coach reviews your glucose data and helps you identify patterns and make dietary or lifestyle adjustments. This personalized feedback loop has shown promise in research
Is there a downside? Some people find that virtual visits feel less personal or that technical issues interfere. Hands-on examinations can't be done remotely. But for routine blood sugar management and data review, telemedicine has proven effective and convenient. For a deeper dive, see our guide on type 2 diabetes remission.
Before a telemedicine appointment, export or screenshot your glucose data from the past 2-4 weeks. Prepare a list of specific questions: "My fasting glucose has been higher on weekdays. Why might that be?" Specific, data-backed questions help your provider give more useful answers than vague discussions about "how things are going."
What Can AI-Powered Food Logging Do for Blood Sugar?
AI-based food logging is one of the newest categories in blood sugar technology. These tools use computer vision and machine learning to estimate the nutritional content of meals from a photograph. A study in Nutrients found that AI-assisted food recognition apps estimated calorie content within 20% accuracy for 70-80% of common foods.[17] While that's not perfect, it's often more accurate than manual estimation.
How AI food logging works
You take a photo of your meal before eating. The app's AI identifies the foods, estimates portion sizes, and calculates approximate macronutrients, including carbohydrates. Some apps then predict the likely glucose response based on the carbohydrate content and, if connected to a CGM, your personal historical data.
Examples include apps like Lumen, January AI, and Zoe, which combine food logging with personalized metabolic data. These platforms aim to tell you not just "this meal has 45 grams of carbs" but "based on your history, this meal is likely to cause a moderate glucose spike."
Limitations to keep in mind
AI food logging works best with single-ingredient foods and standard Western dishes. Mixed dishes, sauces, and culturally specific foods are harder for current algorithms to parse. Restaurant meals remain challenging because preparation methods vary widely. Treat these tools as helpful approximations, not precise measurements. They're most valuable as a complement to CGM data, not a replacement for it.
How Do All These Tools Work Together?
The real value of blood sugar technology emerges when multiple tools share data. Research in The Lancet Digital Health suggests that integrated digital health ecosystems, where glucose data, physical activity, nutrition, and sleep data converge, may produce better outcomes than any single tool alone.[18]
A practical technology stack
Here's what a practical, connected setup might look like for someone interested in blood sugar wellness:
- CGM or glucose meter for glucose data (the core measurement)
- Food tracking app to log meals and estimate carbohydrate intake
- Fitness tracker or smartwatch for step counts, sleep data, and exercise tracking
- Smart scale for weekly weight and body composition trends
- Health platform (Apple Health, Google Health Connect, or similar) to aggregate data from all devices into one dashboard
You don't need all of these at once. Start with whatever is most relevant to your situation. A CGM alone can change how you understand your glucose patterns. Adding a food log doubles the insight. A fitness tracker adds context about movement and sleep. Each layer adds clarity.
The privacy question
With this much personal health data flowing through apps and devices, privacy matters. Look for apps that comply with HIPAA (in the US) or GDPR (in Europe). Read privacy policies to understand whether your data is shared with third parties. Opt out of data sharing where possible. Your glucose data is deeply personal information, and you should control who sees it.
"Technology doesn't replace the fundamentals of blood sugar management: a balanced diet, regular movement, good sleep, and stress management. But it gives you a clearer window into how those fundamentals are working for your unique body."
What Does the Future Hold for Blood Sugar Technology?
Several technologies in development could significantly change blood sugar monitoring within the next few years. Research published in Nature Biotechnology has explored non-invasive glucose sensing through sweat, tears, and saliva.[19] While these approaches haven't yet achieved the accuracy needed for clinical use, they represent where the field is heading.
Technologies on the horizon
- Non-invasive glucose monitoring: Companies are developing optical sensors that measure glucose through the skin without piercing it. Accuracy remains a challenge, but progress is steady. If successful, this could make glucose monitoring as simple as wearing a watch
- Closed-loop systems: For people who use insulin, automated insulin delivery systems (sometimes called "artificial pancreas" systems) combine CGM data with insulin pump algorithms to adjust insulin delivery in real time. These systems are already available and improving rapidly
- Personalized nutrition algorithms: Research from the Weizmann Institute's personalized nutrition study demonstrated that individual glucose responses to the same food vary dramatically between people.[20] Future apps will use your personal microbiome, genetics, and CGM data to predict which foods will raise your blood sugar and which won't
- Voice-activated logging: Simply telling your phone what you ate and having AI log it accurately. This removes the biggest barrier to food tracking: the effort of typing everything in
The direction is clear: blood sugar technology is becoming more accurate, less invasive, more personalized, and more integrated. For people interested in blood sugar wellness, the practical question isn't whether to use technology, but which tools make sense for your goals and budget right now.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and how does it work?
A CGM is a small sensor worn on the body that measures interstitial glucose levels every 1 to 5 minutes. It transmits data wirelessly to a smartphone app or dedicated reader. CGMs show real-time trends and provide alerts for high or low glucose, helping users understand how food, exercise, stress, and sleep affect blood sugar throughout the day.
Do you need a prescription for a CGM?
In the United States, some CGMs like the FreeStyle Libre 3 and Dexcom Stelo are now available over the counter. Others still require a prescription. Availability varies by country. Check with your local pharmacy or healthcare provider for the current rules in your area.
What are the best apps for tracking blood sugar?
Popular options include MySugr for detailed diabetes logging, Cronometer for detailed nutritional tracking, and Sugarmate for CGM integration and Apple Watch display. The best app depends on whether you need simple logging, food analysis, or integration with a specific glucose monitor. Published trials indicate apps with feedback features produce better outcomes.[8]
Can a smartwatch help with blood sugar?
Smartwatches can't measure blood sugar directly as of 2026. However, they track physical activity, sleep quality, heart rate, and stress, all of which affect glucose levels. Some CGM apps display glucose readings on compatible smartwatches. Increased daily step counts, easily tracked by wearables, are associated with improved insulin sensitivity.[9]
Is telemedicine effective for blood sugar care?
Yes. Published trials show telemedicine interventions reduce HbA1c by an average of 0.57% compared to standard care.[15] Virtual consultations allow more frequent check-ins, remote review of glucose data, and timely adjustments to care plans. The ADA endorses telemedicine as a way to improve access to blood sugar care.
How accurate are AI-powered food logging apps?
AI food recognition apps estimate calorie and macronutrient content within about 20% accuracy for most common foods.[17] They work best with simple, single-ingredient foods and standard dishes. Mixed meals and restaurant food remain challenging. Think of them as better-than-guessing tools, not precision instruments.
Support Your Glucose Balance Naturally
Diabec combines 6 Ayurvedic herbs, including Bitter Melon, Fenugreek, and Gymnema, traditionally used to support healthy glucose metabolism and overall wellness.
Support Healthy Blood Sugar NaturallySources & References
- Pickup, J. C., Freeman, S. C., & Sutton, A. J. (2011). Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ, 343, d3805. PMID: 28007348
- Klonoff, D. C., Nguyen, K. T., Garg, S. K., et al. (2022). Continuous glucose monitoring market: current and future opportunities. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 24(S1), S72-S81. PMID: 35804310
- Bolinder, J., Antuna, R., Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, P., et al. (2016). Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 388(10057), 2254-2263. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5
- Martens, T., Beck, R. W., Bode, B. W., et al. (2021). Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. JAMA, 325(22), 2262-2272. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.7444
- World Health Organization. (2021). Diabetes fact sheet. WHO Diabetes Fact Sheet
- Polonsky, W. H., Fisher, L., Schikman, C. H., et al. (2011). Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 34(2), 262-267. doi:10.2337/dc10-1732
- Mathews, S. C., McShea, M. J., Hanley, C. L., et al. (2019). Digital health: a path to validation. npj Digital Medicine, 2(1), 38. PMID: 33045066
- Hou, C., Carter, B., Hewitt, J., et al. (2016). Do mobile phone applications improve glycemic control (HbA1c) in the self-management of diabetes? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE of 14 randomized trials. Diabetes Care, 39(11), 2089-2095. doi:10.2337/dc16-0346
- Yates, T., Haffner, S. M., Schulte, P. J., et al. (2014). Association between change in daily ambulatory activity and cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance (NAVIGATOR trial). European Heart Journal, 35(33), 2220-2229. PMID: 27926890
- Buffey, A. J., Herber-Gast, G. C., Langley, C. K., et al. (2022). The acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting time in adults with standing and light-intensity walking on biomarkers of cardiometabolic health. Sports Medicine, 52(8), 1765-1787. PMID: 35258499
- Liao, D., Sloan, R. P., Cascio, W. E., et al. (1998). Multiple metabolic syndrome is associated with lower heart rate variability. Diabetes Care, 21(12), 2116-2122. PMID: 20054046
- Lee, S. W. H., Ng, K. Y., & Chin, W. K. (2017). The impact of sleep amount and sleep quality on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 31, 91-101. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2016.02.001
- Knowler, W. C., Barrett-Connor, E., Fowler, S. E., et al. (2002). Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(6), 393-403. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa012512
- Neeland, I. J., Turer, A. T., Ayers, C. R., et al. (2012). Dysfunctional adiposity and the risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in obese adults. JAMA, 308(11), 1150-1159. PMID: 22190484
- Lee, S. W. H., Chan, C. K. Y., Chua, S. S., & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2017). Comparative effectiveness of telemedicine strategies on type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12680. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12987-z
- American Diabetes Association. (2020). Telehealth and diabetes care. Diabetes Care, 43(Suppl 1). PMID: 31926655
- Mezgec, S., & Korovsek, B. S. (2017). NutriNet: a deep learning food and drink image recognition system for dietary assessment. Nutrients, 9(7), 657. PMID: 31815195
- Lim, S., & Lee, J. E. (2021). Digital health and diabetes management. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(1), e3-e4. PMID: 33541860
- Bandodkar, A. J., Jeang, W. J., Ghaffari, R., & Rogers, J. A. (2019). Wearable sensors for biochemical sweat analysis. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, 12, 1-22. PMID: 32341081
- Zeevi, D., Korem, T., Zmora, N., et al. (2015). Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell, 163(5), 1079-1094. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001
- Colberg, S. R., Sigal, R. J., Yardley, J. E., et al. (2016). Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 39(11), 2065-2079. doi:10.2337/dc16-1728
- Evert, A. B., Dennison, M., Gardner, C. D., et al. (2019). Nutrition therapy for adults with diabetes or prediabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care, 42(5), 731-754. doi:10.2337/dci19-0014
- Fleming, G. A., Petrie, J. R., Bergenstal, R. M., et al. (2020). Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. Diabetes Care, 43(1), 250-260. doi:10.2337/dci19-0062
- Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., et al. (2019). Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation. Diabetes Care, 42(8), 1593-1603. doi:10.2337/dci19-0028
- Sacks, D. B., Arnold, M., Bakris, G. L., et al. (2011). Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 34(6), e61-e99. doi:10.2337/dc11-9998
- Aleppo, G., Ruedy, K. J., Riddlesworth, T. D., et al. (2017). REPLACE-BG: a randomized trial comparing continuous glucose monitoring with and without routine blood glucose monitoring in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 40(4), 538-545. doi:10.2337/dc16-2482
- Beck, R. W., Riddlesworth, T., Ruedy, K., et al. (2017). Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections. JAMA, 317(4), 371-378. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19975
- Greenwood, D. A., Gee, P. M., Fatkin, K. J., & Peeples, M. (2017). A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 11(5), 1015-1027. doi:10.1177/1932296817713506
- Shah, V. N., & Garg, S. K. (2015). Managing diabetes in the digital age. Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology, 1(1), 16. doi:10.1186/s40842-015-0016-2
- Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. (2009). 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. The Lancet, 374(9702), 1677-1686. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4
- Danne, T., Nimri, R., Battelino, T., et al. (2017). International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care, 40(12), 1631-1640. doi:10.2337/dc17-1600
FDA Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Always consult your healthcare provider before making changes to your monitoring routine or supplement regimen.